Together we will beat cancer


Headlines yesterday suggesting heavy mobile phone use is ‘likely’ to cause cancer are misleading, and don’t reflect what the evidence really shows.

We’ve discussed the problems with a lot of the evidence around mobile phones and cancer before. Overall, this evidence shows that mobiles are unlikely to cause brain tumours (nor any other type of cancer).

It’s important to consider this whole body of evidence, rather than individual studies, particularly since lots of these have come to different conclusions. And many of the studies have issues, meaning that their findings may not be completely reliable.

Yesterday’s study is no exception. Let’s have a look at what it found, why we’re not convinced by its findings, and how it fits into the bigger picture.

New research

The latest study, carried out in France and published in the journal Occupational and Environmental Medicine, is a type of study called a case-control study. These studies compared people with cancer to similar healthy people, along with information about their lives to find patterns.

The new study looked at two specific types of brain tumour – glioma and meningioma. Crucially, the scientists found no link overall between whether people used a mobile phone and whether they developed either of these types of tumour. But they did see a tentative link among a small group of people who said they’d used their phone the most. Hence the headlines.

But before we think about where this finding sits in relation to existing research, it’s important to note that there were a number of problems with the study:

  • People were asked to remember detailed information about their mobile phone use in the past. The ‘controls’ – healthy people on the study chosen because they were broadly similar (e.g. in age and sex) to the patients involved – had to remember back more than a year longer than people with tumours. And the patients’ memories could have been affected by their beliefs about whether mobile phones caused their tumour, or even by the tumour itself.
  • For nearly a fifth of the people diagnosed with tumours – those who were very sick or who had died, a simplified questionnaire was filled out on their behalf by their relatives.
  • The study is quite small: the ‘highest use’ group contained only around 20 glioma cases and 10 meningioma cases. Although some of the results are ‘statistically significant’ (in other words, unlikely to be explained solely by chance), the researchers don’t seem to have corrected for doing several tests (this is important, since the more statistical tests you do during a study, the more likely one of them is to seem ‘significant’ by chance).
  • The study was carried out several years ago – the tumours were diagnosed between 2004-2006. Brain tumours generally take a long time to develop. So the types of phones and the way they worked back then mean the results may not hold for more modern technology.

What does other research show?

In 2011, the International Agency for Research on Cancer (IARC) concluded that the evidence on mobile phones and gliomas was ‘limited’, as it was for another type of brain tumour (acoustic neuroma), and that for other cancer types there wasn’t enough good evidence to come to a conclusion at all (Though it’s worth noting that, as you might expect with such a controversial subject, a minority of the expert panel felt the evidence around glioma and acoustic neuroma was also inadequate to reach a conclusion.

How did they arrive at this conclusion? IARC’s decision was dominated by two studies. One called INTERPHONE (a very large, international study), and a separate large Swedish study. We’ve summarised these findings in this previous blog post, so we won’t rehash that here. But it’s worth noting both of these studies followed the same (case-control) design as this new French study – looking back at what people remember doing. A much more reliable method is known as a ‘cohort’ design, which asks people about their current phone use, then follows them over time to see what happens to them.

Since IARC’s report, two more notable cohort studies have been published. The first, a Danish study published just too late to be included in the IARC discussions, found no link with any type of brain tumour at all, nor with glioma or meningioma in particular. This study was based on subscriber data about people’s mobile use, though, which could theoretically introduce errors if people shared mobiles or used a phone in someone else’s name or a company phone.

Then last summer the biggest study so far – the UK Million Women Study – found no link between mobile phones and any kind of cancer, any kind of brain tumour, nor glioma or meningioma in particular.

There’s a caveat – in the women who used phones the most, the research did show a small increased risk of developing a type of rare brain tumour called an acoustic neuroma.

But an update to this research, including even more recent data meant that this link was no longer seen, nor any link to any other type of brain tumour. The Million Women Study is large and well-conducted, but does still have some limitations – not least that it is restricted to women and there was limited opportunity to update women’s phone use after the start of the study.

But the Danish cohort study found no increased risk of acoustic neuromas, even in people with the highest levels of use. And neither did a cohort study conducted in Sweden published earlier this year. This Swedish study interestingly found evidence to suggest that using a mobile phone may make people who have an acoustic neuroma more likely to have it diagnosed, which could help to explain the conflicting results seen so far.

What next?

As it currently stands, it seems unlikely that using a mobile phone can cause brain tumours, particularly as lab research hasn’t shown a biological way this could happen. And rates of the brain tumours in question haven’t seen an increase over time, despite mobile phone use booming.

But there isn’t enough good evidence to say with absolute confidence that no risk exists.

It’s a well-worn cliché that more research is needed, but in this case it’s the only way to resolve the question and be sure. Some key members of the IARC expert panel recently published their take on where we go next, including recommendations for research that needs to be done.

By focusing on high-quality research, learning from the limitations of past studies, and the ability to gather more long-term data as time goes on, we will eventually come to a clear understanding of any cancer risks posed by using a mobile phone.

It’s important to remember the overall risk of developing brain tumours is small – fewer than 10,000 people are diagnosed with any form of brain or central nervous system tumour each year in the UK, out of a population of more than 63 million.

But when the media report small increases in these already-small chances as meaning people who do a particular, common, thing are “particularly likely” to develop a disease – as one newspaper did – it not only is a complete misrepresentation of what a study says or means. It also scares people.

This may sell newspapers, but it’s extremely unhelpful when trying to help the public understand what they can – and can’t – do to help reduce their chances of cancer.



Coureau G., Bouvier G., Lebailly P., Fabbro-Peray P., Gruber A., Leffondre K., Guillamo J.S., Loiseau H., Mathoulin-Pelissier S. & Salamon R. & Mobile phone use and brain tumours in the CERENAT case-control study, Occupational and Environmental Medicine, DOI:

Image via Wikimedia Commons


Kolon Kanseri September 25, 2014

In addition to brain cancer development, do mobile phones increase the risk for other cancers ? Thanks in advance

James Graves September 7, 2014

I think Cancer Research UK is not an objective source on this matter, as there is some serious conflict of interest. Cancer Research UK receives a lot of money and has close links with the Li Ka Shing Foundation. “Sir Ka-shing Li is Chairman of Cheung Kong (Holdings) Limited and Hutchison Whampoa Limited, with business interests in (…) telecommunications. To date, Hutchison Whampoa is the largest Asian investor in the UK, with over GBP 14 billion investments in 3G mobile broadband (…).” Enough said.

numbertalk July 29, 2014

Mobile Phones have only been widely used for the last 14 years, perhaps in ten years we may start seeing people develop problems..I sincerely hope not though!

C Davis June 9, 2014

My concern is that articles like this do not account for the growing power of smart phones, and the effects over longer time periods with the increasing data transmission rates. Also, for instance, when someone is on a train (effectively a metal box), there maybe a high proportion of passengers simultaneously using their phones, which will compound and intensify the radiation. I am also worried about children having access to mobiles – they seem to be getting younger as parents pass on their old iphones etc. to their offspring. I watched a dad give his one year old son his phone to play a game on the other day! I feel it will be our children and the next generation who may have a different story to tell. We already know that conclusive studies show that young women who have kept phones in their pockets have damaged the silica hairs on the ovaries, and I understand that this is then inherited by their daughters. There are many accounts of people with electro-magnetic sensitivity, who display varying symptoms when exposed to overlapping fields of electro-magnetism. Maybe these vulnerable groups need closer study. The jury is still out – we used to think that smoking wasn’t so bad, and that was not so long ago! Approach with caution; text rather than talk, don’t keep a mobile in a pocket close to your body if you can help it.

Henry Scowcroft June 9, 2014

Stephen – thank you for your comment and your support. We’re pleased we could shed some light on what is a complicated topic.

Henry Scowcroft
Cancer Research UK

Jennifer Kingsley June 9, 2014

My experience (which admittedly dates back to 2001) suggests there is a link. My husband (54) was diagnosed with an astrocytoma in December 2001. After seven weeks delayed radiotherapy the tumour was arrested for one week then started growing. He underwent further surgery then chemotherapy. His tumour was in the left temporal zone. In the chemo ward at the same time were two other men, one 56 the other 29 who both had the same diagnosis. All three men had the tumour on the side on which they held their mobile phones. I know that technology has improved phones but I feel this is pretty conclusive.

Paul June 7, 2014

Good article but surely worth mentioning COSMOS study?

Ian Hughes June 7, 2014

As a radio engineer, I am often asked by concerned people about the risk of cancer from handportable radios of all sorts. My general reply is ‘not in any way proven’, and that you face much bigger dangers elsewhere. Risk versus benefit; it is proven that smoking is bad for you, but people still take up smoking, while sports like skiing and horseriding are also known to have health risks! The clincher is that the smell of a new phone is not from the high molecular weight plastic, but from stuff like mould-release agent, which are known to be potential carcinogens, so you are more at risk by smelling your phone than by talking on it…

Graham Rowe June 5, 2014

What were the stats. re. Brain Tumours before the introduction of mobile phones compared to now?

Elisabeth Cheetham June 5, 2014

Very interesting. A clear, well-written article

Kim June 5, 2014

I started using a mobile phone in 1999 for my job. Some calls were as long as 20 min’s duration. In the evening after work I experienced pains in my head on the side I’d had the phone. On occasion I was (zapped)) in the ear, like an electric shock. This was a Siemens mobile phone and the micro radiation levels were greater then, even so I try not to use my mobile for prolonged periods. It is not in the interests of mobile phone manufactures to have their products associated with any type of illness. I feel the testing of mobiles is unsatisfactory, the skull thickness they use is that of an American Marine, what about the skull thickness of a child or small person. I did not imagine my pain or headaches. Caution advised.

Stephen Pidgeon June 5, 2014

Thank you CRUK. Absolute clarity and the authority to reassure us all. I’m really grateful.
Perhaps I ought to increase my monthly donation!!

sandra farn June 5, 2014

Still not convinced seeing as my husband used a mobile phone for five years and died of a glioblastoma in 1999.

Sean Mcgee May 19, 2014

From your article;
It’s a well-worn cliché that more research is needed, but in this case it’s the only way to resolve the question and be sure. Some key members of the IARC expert panel recently published their take on where we go next, including recommendations for research that needs to be done.”……
How research is not getting done?
DARIUSZ LESZCZYNSKI has a doctorate in molecular biology and is an expert in biological and health effects of mobile phone radiation. He is associated professor of biochemistry at the University of Helsinki, Finland. Participated in the World Health Organisation WHO‘s cancer panel IARC, which in 2011 classified radiation from mobile phones, wireless networks and the like as possible carcinogens.

Dariusz Leszczynski was research professor at the Finnish radiation protection STUK during the period 2000-2013, research on the biological effects of radiofrequency fields.
Leszczynski was under strong pressure of censorship by STUK and was recently dismissed due. to their critical views on the Interphone study – though economic cutbacks was the official reason that he alone among 20 researchers had to stop.
video here ;
Youtube carries now my presentation at FELO Conference in Oslo, Norway on March 28, 2014 is now available in full, not only slides (DL presentation FELO, Oslo, March 2014) but now also audio and video. Duration 1.29 mins
A video with some comments by Prof Chris Busby is attached to the link with another take on the mecahnisms that might be causing cancers in and around the head area..

Sean Mcgee May 19, 2014

how to make pop corn with cell phones ..
of course the brain is not like pop corn fortunately ??