Leaders team up to combat cancer worldwide

Indian beedies

There needs to be international action on tobacco

Today, leaders from cancer organisations across the world – from Australia to Argentina, and Taiwan to Turkey – have issued a joint statement about how to address the growing burden of cancer worldwide.

It’s the first time that so many eminent cancer scientists and policy makers, from so many nations, have spoken with one voice about what needs to be done to combat cancer – in the poorest as well as the richest nations.

The statement comes off the back of a consensus meeting of 25 leaders of cancer organisations, chaired by our Chief Executive, Dr Harpal Kumar, and Professor Harold Varmus, Director of the US National Cancer Institute.

It aims both to raise the profile of global cancer issues, and to act as an urgent clarion call to action. The report is published in the journal Science Translational Medicine – but we’ve summarised its key points below. Continue reading

The science of healthy habits

Understanding healthy and unhealthy behaviours through research is crucial

Understanding healthy and unhealthy behaviours through research is crucial

We all know the old ‘maxim prevention is better than cure’, and this is certainly true of cancer. More than 300,000 of us develop the disease in the UK each year. Each diagnosis is devastating for the person and their loved ones.

Huge progress is being made in treating cancer, but it would clearly be better if we could prevent people developing the disease in the first place.

There are many things that affect our cancer risk that we can’t control – including our age and genes. But there are several things that we can do to reduce the risk.

Smoking, being overweight or obese, eating an unhealthy diet, and drinking too much alcohol are all preventable causes of cancer, and more than four in ten cases could be prevented by changes to lifestyle.

So it’s easy then is it – all we need to do is lead a healthy lifestyle to cut our cancer risk?

That’s easier said than done. Ever found yourself making a conscious effort to stop eating from the bowl of crisps on the table only to find yourself reaching out for them without realising it? Made plans to go for a jog but never quite got around to it because something urgently needed tidying?

We’ve all been there.

That’s why we fund groups like the Health Behaviour Research Centre at University College London, run by Professor Jane Wardle.

The Centre carries out research on lifestyle behaviour, to find ways to help people achieve their healthy ambitions. The work isn’t about coming up with flash-in-the-pan health fads, but developing evidence-based ways to help people adopt a long-term healthier lifestyle, and improving how information about health is communicated.

The centre focuses on three broad areas: food choice and weight (the ‘Energy Balance Research Group’); cancer communication and screening; and the tobacco control group.

Some of their recent work includes:

In this post we’ll look at some of the HBRC’s current projects, including whether weight loss can help cut cancer risk, what advice cancer survivors want about their lifestyle, and how people make decisions about whether to go for cancer screening. Continue reading

A small cardboard box – what’s all the fuss about?

Cancer campaigners

We’ve been campaigning to put tobacco in plain packs

Over the next couple of days, MPs in Westminster will be opening their mail to find a range of shiny, rectangular boxes, colourful and slickly designed to maximise the appeal of their contents.

Like all packaging of branded products – from washing powder to chocolate bars – the boxes act as a silent salesman, enticing people to make a purchase.

But unlike most branded products, the boxes politicians are receiving this week are designed to market and sell a uniquely deadly product: cigarettes.

Cigarettes aren’t something MPs would usually get in the post – at least we hope not – and they’re certainly not products we’ve ever mailed out before. But yes, we did send these packages.

The money to fund this didn’t come from our research funding – it was paid for by a personal donation from a supporter wanting to support our anti-tobacco campaign.

It’s an extremely unusual thing for a cancer charity to do, and it’s not something we’ve done lightly. But tobacco is exceptional in the seriousness of its impact on health. Exceptional adversaries warrant exceptional actions.

Continue reading

Guest post – “Plain packs won’t encourage smuggling”

Girl looking at plain pack

Plain packs will protect children

Richard Ferry is a Trading Standards Officer based in North East England, with more than thirty years experience of dealing with counterfeit or fake goods.

He currently specialises in tobacco control, investigating the supply of illicit tobacco and working with a range of enforcement agencies. His work has led to the seizure and destruction of large amounts of smuggled and counterfeit tobacco.

Day in, day out, as Trading Standards officers, my colleagues and I visit shops and retailers around the country, checking what’s being sold is legitimate, and protecting the British public from dangerous products.

So the fact that tobacco packs make this product more attractive to children, and try to disguise the harm their contents causes, is why we at Trading Standards have supported the idea of putting tobacco products in plain, standardised packs.

We think the evidence is clear – plain packs will be less appealing to young people, and will reduce the misleading influence packaging has on the minds of consumers. For example, there’s still a perception among some smokers – a mistaken one – that white and silver brands are lower tar and less harmful.

The tobacco industry claims that plain, standardised packaging would result in a rise in illegal tobacco sales, and make it easier to produce counterfeit versions of well known brands.

I can say, hand on heart, as an experienced Trading Standards officer, that the evidence to support these claims simply doesn’t stand up.

Consider this. Counterfeiters already have a long track-record of turning out fakes of popular goods, from DVDs to hair straighteners, within weeks of a new product being launched.

Plain, standardised cigarette pack

We want cigarette packs to look like this

The proposed new tobacco packaging would be no easier to counterfeit than the brands currently available on shop shelves – contrary to what many believe, the new packs won’t be plain boxes at all, but will include colour pictures, text warnings, and other labelling, and will require the same level of printing skills as required now.

My colleagues are experienced in identifying counterfeit products, and the use of technology is increasingly our best line of defence.

Manufacturers already place covert markings, or security tags such as holograms, on their products to help identify them as genuine, and this includes manufacturers of cigarettes and tobacco products. We already rely on these markings to identify illicit tobacco.

Standardised packs will still have these identifiers on them, which will allow us, and our colleagues in other enforcement agencies, to tell real cigarettes from fakes.

Another point few realise is that much of the illegal tobacco now being seized in the North East is of brands made outside the UK for other markets. These are not on legal sale in this country, and you won’t see them on shop shelves. The criminals supplying these make no attempt to pass them off as legal tobacco products and they are easy to spot. And plain packaging will make spotting them even easier.

Tobacco is the only product on our shelves that kills half of its long term users when it is used as the manufacturers intend. It is a lethal product sold in packaging that aims to disguise the harm it causes.

Given the impact of tobacco on health and wellbeing, measures to help prevent kids starting to smoke, and aid existing smokers to quit through standardised packaging of all tobacco should be adopted as soon as possible.

Richard

Plain packs – exploding the smuggling myth

Cigarette

Tobacco industry claims on cigarette packaging are nonsense

A quarter of all cancer deaths are caused by smoking. Our research tells us that plain packaging will make cigarettes less attractive to young people and help cut the number who are drawn into this deadly addiction. It would mean that all cigarette packs look the same – with no branding but with large health warnings.

The tobacco industry hates the idea. While the UK government considers the pros and cons of plain packs, they’ve been spending millions (requires registration) on adverts claiming that it will massively increase smuggling because the new packs will be easier to forge.

If true, this would be a big problem. Illicit cigarettes make it cheaper to smoke, leading to more people smoking – and more people dying from cancer.

To see if their claims stack up, we asked for the view of an international tobacco smuggling expert, Luk Joossens, whose career has seen him advise the World Bank, the European Commission and the World Health Organisation on this issue. And today we’ve published Joossens’ detailed report on the matter, which you can download here.

Continue reading

NCRI conference session: global inequalities in cancer

Earth

Over half the world’s cancer deaths occur in developing countries

Despite common (mis)conception that cancer is a ‘modern’ disease of Western society (which we’ve discussed here), well over half of the world’s cancer deaths happen in developing countries. But it’s true that many cases of cancer are linked to our lifestyles. And, as people in the poorer countries of the world start living longer and adopting more Western lifestyles, cancer rates will rise.

And while breakthroughs in prevention, diagnosis and treatment are made in the richer parts of the world, too often their benefits don’t reach the world’s poorest.

For example, eight out of 10 cancer patients in Africa have no access to radiotherapy, while endoscopies, biopsies, chemotherapy and pain relief are also too often unavailable.

This growing problem was the subject of a pivotal session at this year’s NCRI conference.  We heard from three leading experts working to improve cancer outcomes across the world – Cancer Research UK’s Professor Max Parkin, Dr Rengaswamy Sankaranarayanan from the International Agency for Research on Cancer (IARC), and Dr Rajendra Badwe from the Tata Memorial Centre in Mumbai.

Continue reading

The party conference – our Ambassador’s view

David Collins, cancer ambassador

David Collins, cancer campaigns ambassador

Former police constable David Collins is a volunteer Ambassador for our political campaigns.

We took David and 17 other passionate advocates to Liberal Democrat, Labour and Conservative party conferences this year, to represent our campaign for plain packaging of tobacco.

Here he reflects on his experiences of this important assignment.

Continue reading