Cancer Research UK on Google+ Cancer Research UK on Facebook Cancer Research UK on Twitter
Donate

Let's beat cancer sooner

Pancreatic cancer cells - image courtesy of the London Research Institute EM Unit

Pancreatic cancer has one of the poorest survival rates of any common cancers, with only three per cent of patients still alive five years after diagnosis.

And despite our advances in understanding the disease, this figure has barely budged in the last 40 years.

One reason for the lack of improvement is pancreatic cancer often doesn’t have early-stage symptoms, and so is often very advanced by the time patients are diagnosed.

In fact, more than eight out of 10 people with pancreatic cancer are diagnosed when their cancer has already spread, which means that surgery to remove the tumour is sadly no longer an option.

But at the moment, there are no reliable ways to detect the disease early – and one is desperately needed.

So, naturally, when one catches wind of any advances in early detection in the pancreatic cancer field, there’s always a certain amount of raised hope and excitement.

Possibly a bit too much excitement, in the case of today’s story.

Today’s headlines read “simple urine test” for pancreatic cancer – but as we’ve said before these tests are rarely “simple” and in many cases, like this one, they aren’t even ‘tests’ yet.

So what’s the actual story?

A step forward

While there is a protein in the blood, CA19-9, which some pancreatic cancers secrete, it’s not produced by all types of tumours. This is why at the moment it‘s used by doctors alongside other tests to help diagnose patients who are already suspected of having the disease.

And while some research has shown CA19-9 levels might be raised in patients up to two years before they’re diagnosed, it’s not yet accurate enough to use to diagnose patients.

So a team of scientists at Barts Cancer Institute, Queen Mary University of London, decided to look for proteins in urine that could help identify patients with early-stage pancreatic cancer.

One of the advantages of a urine-based test is that urine is, in general, much less complex to analyse and less invasive to collect.

video_thumbnail

Find out more about pancreatic cancer by watching this video: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=z1fh4FQs1p4

To find out if there were any measurable signs linked to cancer, the team – led by Dr Tatjana Crnogorac-Jurcevic – looked at levels of 1,500 proteins in urine samples from 18 patients – six of whom had pancreatic cancer, six who had a benign inflammatory disease of the pancreas called chronic pancreatitis (which can increase your risk of developing pancreatic cancer) and six healthy individuals.

They noticed that three proteins – LYVE-1, REG1A and TFF1 – were higher in pancreatic cancer patients.

These proteins, they suspected, could potentially be used to help distinguish patients with early-stage pancreatic cancer from healthy individuals.

And further studies they carried out, in a larger number of patients, showed tentative signs that this might be the case.

But before we get ahead of ourselves, there’s still a long way to go before we know if this research could lead to a test that would help detect pancreatic cancer early.

The study only validated how well these three proteins predicted things using 488 urine samples, from 192 patients with pancreatic cancer, 92 patients with chronic pancreatitis and 87 healthy volunteers.

This analysis showed that urine from patients with pancreatic cancer showed elevated levels of each of the three proteins when compared to healthy individuals. So in combination, the set of proteins seems to be fairly good at differentiating healthy individuals from patients.

But – crucially – the protein levels couldn’t reliably tell the difference between chronic pancreatitis and pancreatic cancer patients. And this could be a fairly big stumbling block for a useful test, and might have implications for who it could potentially benefit.

So before we go galloping down the road to clinical tests, there are some key questions that still need answering.

Key questions

The first one being: even if this test were proven reliable in future studies, who would you offer it to?

The test is unlikely be used on the general population due to the relative infrequency of pancreatic cancer, which would mean it wouldn’t be time or cost-effective. A useful test for pancreatic cancer is rather more likely to be targeted towards groups at higher risk, such as those with chronic pancreatitis, or with a family history of the disease.

Any test that aimed to spot pancreatic cancer would also need to be able to reliably tell the difference between cancer, and other non-cancerous conditions like chronic pancreatitis, or diabetes. And, as mentioned previously, this ‘three protein’ method can’t yet reliably discriminate between those with chronic pancreatitis and pancreatic cancer is much less reliable.

Another question we have is whether the protein levels are still as accurate at predicting cancer when the control group (healthy people) is as old as the pancreatic cancer patients?

The median age of healthy patients on the study, and those with pancreatic cancer, differed by over 20 years. As the risk of cancer increase with age, it is crucial to see if the results are the same when comparing apples to apples.

Next steps

To address some of these questions, the team is now planning further research on urine sample from high risk groups, as well as collecting more long–term data to see if the proteins are present in urine in the time between the genetic changes that could cause the cancer to develop, and diagnosis.

But the key thing that needs to be proven, in future research, is whether the ability to detect pancreatic cancers using this test translates into earlier diagnoses and lives saved.

But the question of whom could benefit from such a test still remains.

This story touches on two hugely important areas – pancreatic cancer, and the search for ways to diagnose cancer earlier. These are both areas we’re prioritising in our new research strategy, so it’s always welcome when new findings move things forward.

But we need to be careful not to over-egg things, and raise false hope of new tests, when there’s such a long way ahead.

Misha

Reference

Comments

Paul Toovey September 27, 2015

While no one in my family have died from this type of cancer (and no one from the male side of my family of any type of cancer) I am all too happy to take part in research. I am a regular event volunteer with cancer research uk and I really enjoy it.

Mal bonner September 9, 2015

While I do not have pancreatic cancer or any connection with it (no relatives etc) I was as a retired engineer impressed with the scientific reasoning of the article!

Cheryl Townsend September 6, 2015

My father died of Pancreatic cancer nearly four years ago. I was at the Pancreatic Supporters Conference in London 2 years ago and donated urine in order for the research into looking at whether a simple urine test could help in early diagnose of the deadly disease, which only 3% of those diagnosed live past 5 years.

Mark A. Wright September 4, 2015

My dad died of pancreatic cancer. I would be only too happy to take part in a research study.

Maria September 4, 2015

Very interesting and informative article. Would be interested to support any tests, I have immediate family history

Mrs J Corbin September 4, 2015

I was very interested to read about your research into `pancreatic cancer’ – and it does concern me that there is no direct cause or symptom to alleviate ourselves from falling victim to it. Thankfully, there is no history in my family, but appreciate your making us aware and applaud you for your research into diagnosis.

Margaret September 3, 2015

My mother died of pancreatic cancer less than three months after diagnosis. I would also like to be given the chance to join any research.

Boyd September 3, 2015

It will stop a lot of people dying in pain when you get a break through our daughter died of this so very sad every day I miss her, she was so lovely and had three children.died age forty four

Barts Cancer Institute September 3, 2015

Patients and family members interested in keeping up to date with the planned trials can contact us, and lead researcher Dr Crnogorac-Jurcevic, via this link: http://www.bci.qmul.ac.uk/about-us/contact-us
and we will get back to you ASAP.

Maria September 3, 2015

My husband died of pancreatic cancer 1 year after being diagnosed he was very fit and healthy there was no symptoms at all no pain no weight loss prior to diagnosis any advance in detecting this horrible cancer no matter how small must be found and given the highest priority, the statistics for this cancer leaves very little hope and whilst my husband was well cared for I did feel the doctors just accepted the inevitable, there was no real fight to save him

Merv Humphreys September 3, 2015

It’s a pity there’s a gap between a scientific view of how much progress has been made and its wider reporting. Perhaps we need a sort of traffic light/ medal system for reporting findings eg bronze = looks promising but it’s not a breakthrough ; silver – we’re ready to move to live testing on patients. or gold – producing positive results.

Dorothy Lopez-Ferreiro September 3, 2015

Thank you for this scientific detailed information. I was one of the people misled by pres reports. My husband died of pancreatic cancer in June 1998, having been energetic and fit right up to late Sept 1997. I was alarmed when he began to lose weight rapidly, felt constantly sick and weak but GP’s gave him Gaviscon and thought that an endoscopy ruled out disease. It was not until an ultrasound in April 1997 that a tumour in the stomach was noticed, blocking the pyloric sphincter. Exploratory surgery showed that the “aggressive” tumour had spread I have copies of many of his medical notes which I will gladly share if they are of any use.

Dorothy Lopez-Ferreiro.

Avril September 3, 2015

My father died of pancreatic cancer – any volunteers needed for your research – happy to put my name forward

Susan August 5, 2015

My husband is an identical twin his twin brother passed away of pancreatic cancer. Although we do what we can to check for the disease, we are always concerned about early detection

Sue Cooper August 5, 2015

It may be early stages but, if tests on high risk people can be done quickly, this would surely speed up the end result. My mother, sister and brother all died from pancreatic cancer and my other sister and I would be quick to volunteer for the study if we only knew how to go about it.

Jayne Webb August 4, 2015

My father his brother and their father all died of pancreatic cancer. Would there be any chance of joining in research